Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner
|
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer




PM
Dublin




PM
Chicago




AM
Kuala Lumpur
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner Bottom Left Corner Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer
Home | Directories | Events | 24-HR HelpDesk | Membership | Contacts | Magazine
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer
NEWS >HeadlinesAsiaEuropeAfrica & Middle EastNorth AmericaLatin AmericaAlternative FuelsConvenience Retailing
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer
White Border Top
Spacer
Orpak Side
Spacer
White Border Bottom
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer
White Border Top
Spacer
Husky Side Banner
Spacer
White Border Bottom
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer
Fafnir Top Banner
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner ADVERTISEMENT Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer

Hungary: Court Rejects OMV Lawsuit

Print E-mail
Monday, 19 May 2008
A potential takeover by Austrian oil firm OMV of Hungarian rival MOL MOLB.BU that could be worth $20 billion received a fresh setback last week when a court in Hungary threw out a lawsuit it had brought. OMV  which owns 20 percent of MOL, had sought to dismantle statutes which limit voting rights for holders of MOL stock.

The court said that the voting cap and rights associated with a voting preference share held by the government had been part of MOL's statutes for years and that the court only had the authority to rule on fresh changes to the statutes.

A rule which limits how many board members may be dismissed at one time was in line with the civil code, the court said, adding that it had no authority to consider whether it was in line with the Companies Act.

It said that if a shareholder suspected the rule was not in accordance with the act, they should have challenged it after the rule was passed, but no challenge was made.

PetrolWorld 160508 

 
Spacer
Spacer
  Spacer  
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer
Grey Border Top
Spacer Spacer
Grey Border Bottom
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner Spacer Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer
Fafnir Side Banner
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner ADVERTISEMENT Bottom Right Corner
Spacer
Top Left Corner Spacer Top Right Corner
Spacer
Pro Sales Side Banner
Spacer
Bottom Left Corner ADVERTISEMENT Bottom Right Corner
Spacer

© 2012 PETROLWORLD.COM | TERMS & CONDITIONS  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT US