Sri Lanka: Elections Influence Fuel Prices
|
|
|
|
Thursday, 21 January 2010 |
|
The government move of cutting the import duty on fuel by Rs.34 and
reducing petrol prices by Rs. 15 just about a month ahead of
presidential polls has pushed Sri Lankan fuel retailers towards a no
–win situation, according to K.R. Suresh Kumar, Managing Director of
Lanka IOC (LIOC).
Mr Kumar said “The tax reduction will help Ceylon Petroleum
Corporation (CPC), and Lanka IOC to tackle their losses only if the
petrol price were maintained at the previous level.”
LIOC has been making losses during the past eight months except for a
profit of Rs.1 per litre of petrol in November last year. At that time
the purchase price of petrol was $40 per barrel, he said, noting that
last month’s profits from petrol sales are likely to turn into losses
as the current world market price is around $80. Referring to stocks,
he said the company has a stock of 26 million litres of petrol and they
are expecting a shipment of another 30 million litres next month so
that there will not be a shortage of fuel before or after the elections.
Mr Suresh Kumar said that the government is still levying high taxes on
fuel including the excise duty of Rs.25, 5%VAT, 3% Public
Administration Levy and 1% Provincial council tax. He urged the
government to reduce VAT and other taxes so that they could divert
their profits from the sale of petrol to improve infrastructure at
their retail outlets as well as the lubricant plant at Trincomalee.
“There is an urgent need to review the duty structure and impose a
rationalized duty structure with fixed and variable components to
accommodate rise and fall in the import prices,” he said. LIOC incurred
a loss of over Rs.2.2 billion last year due to high import duty other
taxes and government directed prices, he said, adding that stability in
prices would be possible if the government takes a long term view of
the price structure and address the issue keeping the interest of all
the stakeholders.
Meanwhile LIOC has increased its share in the country’s bunkering
market, which some of its competitors alleged as anti-competitive
practices that would hurt the sustainability of the industry. LIOC’s
share had surged to a massive 60 %, allegedly due to its latest market
practices of selling $10 to 20 lower than the market price, sources in
the industry alleged. Citing an example they noted that on November 6
last year the price (CST) of High Sulfur Fuel Oil 380 in Singapore was
$470 per metric ton while in Colombo LIOC sold it for $460. This was a
concerted effort to undercut and desatabilise the market, they said.
But Mr Suresh Kumar pointed out that LIOC had to sell fuel to ships
through bunkering at current international market prices. He said that
if the company did not follow this formula, it would lose its
competitiveness in the bunkering business. He said that more ships are
calling at the Colombo port for bunkering and the company was planning
to expand its Sri Lanka bunkering operations on a large scale. However
he denied that they were selling bunkers at a price lower than that of
Singapore, dismissing the claims that LIOC was not trying to undercut
its rivals.
PetrolWorld 180110
|